UDC 338.43:631.15

 

A. Diuk

 

The urgency of the problem. Agriculture as a special industry, specific in organizational and economic structure and social significance, imitates the specifics of theoretical and methodological justifications of the principles of social responsibility, as well as criteria of social performance. Scientific substantiations of perspective development of agricultural enterprises methodically concern not only economic, but also social direction of activity. The in-house economic assessment of the composition of socially oriented expenditures is of exceptional importance in the formation of social responsibility, to which attention should be paid immediately. The priority of the given knowledge meets the criterion of exclusive social significance of agrarian management for the development of rural areas, therefore the methodical assessment of the process needs to be improved, first of all from the standpoint of taking into account modern transformational dynamics.
The purpose of the article is to deepen the theoretical provisions of the essence of social responsibility and propose methodological principles for assessing its formation in the production system of agricultural enterprises.
Results of the research.The article proposes improvement of theoretical principles of understanding of the essence of social responsibility of agricultural enterprises on the basis of determination of methodological provisions of evaluation of its representation in the production system. The levels of social responsibility in the functioning of enterprises have been determined. The subsystems of formation of social responsibility of agricultural enterprises are characterized. The proposal of components of formation of social responsibility is made – the mechanisms (subsystems) of its implementation are put into practice with the disclosure of methodological aspects of evaluation. The expediency of applying the category of expenditures to determine the economic basis of the formation of social responsibility in agricultural enterprises was methodically proved.

Keywords: entrepreneurship, social responsibility, production system, methodological aspects, estimation, costs.

References:

1. Andriichuk V.H. (2018). Osnovy naukovykh doslidzhen v ahrobiznesi : navch. Posibnyk. [Fundamentals of Scientific Research in Agribusiness: Educ. Manual ]Kyiv : KNEU. 491 (in Ukrainian)
2. Berhman Kh. (1969). Razdelenye truda y spetsyalyzatsyia v selskom khoziaistve. [Division of labor and specialization in agriculture] Per. s nem. Yu.Y. Tymofeeva y O.H. Tropova. Moskva. 296 p.
3. Diiesperov V.S. (2013). Evoliutsiia silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv. [Evolution of agricultural enterprises]. K. NNTs IAE. 290 p. (in Ukrainian)
4. Yvanukh R.A. y dr. (1983). Spravochnyk эkonomycheskykh pokazatelei selskoho khoziaistva [Handbook of Agricultural Economic Indicators]/ R.A. Yvanukh, M.M. Panteleichuk, Y.V. Popovych; Per. s ukr., dop. Y pererab. K. Urozhai. 184 р. (in Russian)
5. Kolot A. M. (2011). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist liudyny yak chynnyk stiikoi sotsialnoi dynamiky: teoretychni zasady [Social responsibility of a person as a factor of sustainable social dynamics: theoretical principles] / Ukraina: aspekty pratsi [Elektronnyi resurs] : nauk.- ekon. ta susp.-polit. zhurnal / Vyd-vo «Pratsia»; hol. red. O. Varetska. №3. р. 3-9. (in Ukrainian)
6. Korporatyvna sotsialna vidpovidalnist biznesu: monohrafiia [Corporate social responsibility of business]/ Pid zahalnoiu redaktsiieiu (2015). M. P. Bukovynskoi. K.: TsP «Komprynt». 297 р. (in Ukrainian)
7. Kosharnaia H.B. (2014). Sotsyalnaia otvetstvennost subъektov predprynymatelstva: ystoryia y sovremennost [Social responsibility of business entities: history and modernity]. Yzvestyia vыsshykh uchebnыkh zavedenyi. Povolzhskyi rehyon. №1 (29). S. 100 – 108. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsialnaya-otvetstvennost-subektov-predprinimatelstva-istoriya-i-sovremennost (in Russian)
8. Lopatynskyi Yu. M. (2006). Transformatsiia ahrarnoho sektoru: instytutsiini zasady [Transformation of the agrarian sector: institutional framework] .Chernivtsi : Ruta. 344 (in Ukrainian)
9. Lupenko Yu.O., Shpykuliak O.H., Malik M.I. ta in. (2017). Rozvytok malykh ahrarnykh pidpryiemstv u rynkovomu instytutsiinomu seredovyshchi: indykatory ta efektyvnist [Development of small-scale agrarian enterprises in a market-based institutional environment: indicators and efficiency]/Natsionalnyi naukovyi tsentr «Instytut ahrarnoi ekonomiky» [Lupenko Yu.O., Shpykuliak O.H., Malik M.I. ta in.]; za red. O.H. Shpykuliaka. K. : NNTs «IAE», 2017. 204 (in Ukrainian)
10. Malik M.I., Mamchur V.A., Shpykuliak O.H. (2017). Instytutsionalne seredovyshche ta formuvannia sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti ahrarnykh pidpryiemstv. [Institutional environment and formation of social responsibility of agricultural enterprises] Ekonomika APK.  №12.p. 5-13.(in Ukrainian)
11. Malik M.I., Shpykuliak O.H. (2005). Kadrovyi potentsial ahrarnykh pidpryiemstv : upravlinskyi aspekt [Personnel potential of agricultural enterprises: management aspect] : monohrafiia. Kyiv : NNTs «IAE». 368 p.(in Ukrainian)
12. Myroslav Marynovych. (2019). Mytropolyt Andrei Sheptytskyi i pryntsyp «pozytyvnoi sumy» [Andrey Sheptytsky and the principle of “positive sum”]/ peredmova Adriana Slyvotskoho – Lviv : Vydavnytstvo Staroho Leva. 248 p. (in Ukrainian)
13. Metodы opredelenyia эkonomycheskoi эffektyvnosty selskokhoziaistvennoho proyzvodstva [Methods for determining the economic efficiency of agricultural production] (1959) / Otv. red.: K.P. Obolenskyi. Hosplanyzdat. 240 р.
14. Mochernyi S.V., Larina Ya.S., Ustenko  O.A., Yurii S.I. (2006). Ekonomichnyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk:  [Economic Encyclopedic Dictionary] U 2 t. T.2 /Za red. S.V. Mochernoho. Lviv: Svit. 568 р.15. Obykhod H.O. (2016).  Instytutsionalizatsiia ekolohichnoi bezpeky Ukrainy [Institutionalization of Ukraine’s environmental security] : monohrafiia. Kyiv. 304 р.(in Ukrainian)
15. Rozvytok pidpryiemnytstva i kooperatsii: instytutsionalnyi aspekt : [Entrepreneurship and cooperation development: institutional aspect] (2016) [Lupenko Yu.O., Malik M.I., Zaiats V.M. ta inshi]. K. : NNTs «IAE». 430 p. (in Ukrainian)
16. Sychevskyi M.P. (2014). Formuvannia natsionalnoi prodovolchoi systemy na zasadakh nezalezhnosti [Formation of national food system on the basis of independence]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky. №6. p. 11 – 18.
17. Smit Adam. Doslidzhennia pro pryrodu i prychyny bahatstva narodiv [Research on the nature and causes of the wealth of nations](2018) / per. z anhl. Vasyliev, M. Mezhevikina, A. Malivskyi. K., 736 p. (in Ukrainian)
18. Sociological encyclopedia (2008). [Sociological encyclopedia] / Compiled V.H. Horodyanenko.Kyiv Akademvydav. 456 p. (Series “Encyclopedia erudite”) (in Ukrainian).
19. Ford Henri. (2016). Moie zhyttia ta robota [My life is that work]/ per. z anhl. Uliany Dzhaman. K. : Nash Format. 344 p. (in Ukrainian)
20. Kharytonova E.V., Krыlova E.M. (2014). Sotsyalyzatsyia predprynymatelstva kak faktor rosta natsyonalnoho bohatstva [Socialization of entrepreneurship as a factor in the growth of national wealth]. Sotsyalno-эkonomycheskye yavlenyia y protsessы. 9. №5. S. 76 – 83. URL:  https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsializatsiya-predprinimatelstva-kak-faktor-rosta-natsionalnogo-bogatstva. (in Russian)
21. Khvesyk M.A., Obykhod H.O. (2018) Novitnii vymir ekolohichnykh vyklykiv ta zahroz stalomu rozvytku v epokhu hlobalizatsii [The newest dimension of environmental challenges and threats to sustainable development in the age of globalization]. Ekonomika pryrodokorystuvannia i stalyi rozvytok. №3-4 (22 – 23). p. 5-18. (in Ukrainian)
22. Shebanina O. V., Kormyshkin Yu. A. (2019).  Suchasna paradyhma innovatsiinoho rozvytku ahrarnoho pidpryiemnytstva [Modern paradigm of innovative development of agrarian entrepreneurship]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky Prychornomoria. 3. DOI: 10.31521/2313-092X/2019-3(103). (in Ukrainian)
23. Shpykuliak O.H. (2007). Vytraty ta efektyvnist vyrobnytstva produktsii v silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstvakh (monitorynh) [Costs and efficiency of production in agricultural enterprises (monitoring)]/ O.H. Shpykuliak, Yu.P. Voskobiinyk, O.V. Ovsiannikov ta in.; Za red. O.H. Shpykuliaka, Yu.P. Voskobiinyka, O.V. Ovsiannikova. K. 294 (in Ukrainian)
24. Shpykuliak O.H. (2008). Instytut vytrat v ekonomichnii teorii i praktytsi hospodariuvannia [Institute of Costs in Economic Theory and Practice of Management]. nauk. prats. Ekonomichni nauky. Seriia ekonomichna teoriia ta ekonomichna istoriia. vyp. 5(19), Ch. 2. Lutsk. p. 323-329.(in Ukrainian)
25. Shpykuliak O.H. (2007). Stanovlennia sotsialnoho kapitalu v ahrarnii sferi transformatsiinoi ekonomiky. [Formation of social capital in the agrarian sphere of transformation economy]. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, Volume 8. Page 28 – 34. URL : http://mts.asu.lt/mtsrbid/article/view/678/704.(in Ukrainian)
26. Shumpeter, J.A. (2011). Teoriia ekonomichnoho rozvytku: doslidzhennia prybutkiv, kapitalu, kredytu, vidsotka ta ekonomichnoho tsyklu [Theory of economic development: the study of profits, capital, credit, interest and the economic cycle]. Kуіv: Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (in Ukrainian).

 

UDC 339.92:332

 

I. Honcharenko

V. Pereta

N. Kuchmanich

The article discusses the economic opportunities that can be used to develop and achieve the strategic goals of regional communities in the region.
The value of the developing of  recommendations for the provision of the region’s integrated territorial communities capacity development  will increase in the face of new global challenges.  One of the key areas of the implementation of new policy is a decentralization of power and an increasing of the level of financial independence and institutional capacity of the territorial communities of our country.
The strategic management function is one of the most common functions of the territorial communities.  Its sense is in the creation of the conditions for their self-preservation and self-development on the basis of rational use of the natural, industrial, scientific, labor, demographic, social and cultural potentials of the territory and increase of business activity.
Through the realization of this function, an achievement of the goals of territorial development is ensured, specifically – direct life support and improving of the quality of life of the population, an enhancing of the role of the territory in the social division of labor on the basis of the formation of rational economic specialization.
The term  “potential” in the context of territorial development is used as an economic opportunity that can be used to develop and achieve the strategic goals of the territorial communities. Strategies of the United Territorial Communities are a guide to action, a mean of coordinating efforts and ensuring continuity of decisions.
The prospective development of the territories also implies the elimination of the complex influence of the potential of such phenomena as unemployment, liquidation of enterprises, and factors that hinder the creation of new working places. No single line of economic problem is solved simply. Often, community leaders tend to focus on one particular aspect of a problem without fully understanding of its interaction with other components. The effectiveness of the development and implementation of strategy largely depends on the formulation of the main strategic goals, priority of the tactical tasks, the availability of material, manpower and financial resources, which are necessary for an achievement of the   the set of strategic guidelines, the effectiveness of the mechanisms of strategy implementation in the form of financial and non-financial institutions, as well as national, targeted and regional development programs and specific projects for strategic goals achievement; an adequate monitoring and control system for the implementation of the strategy.
The components of the strategic development potential for the territorial communities of Mykolaiv region are:
– natural and climatic conditions (flat terrain, temperate climate, large areas of agricultural land, large size of the area of ​​individual fields, etc.);
– resource opportunities (minerals, mobile labor, etc.);
– geographical position (presence of transport corridors, favorable radius of delivery of gricultural products, transit position, etc.);
– high demand for major export-oriented crops (opportunities for the agrarian sector of the economy).
Under the conditions of the  instability of socio-economic situation, shortage of financial and economic resources, the communities of the region seek to exploit the potential of international structures, but mostly formulate development strategies that provide orientation to the use of local resources and reserves in order to ensure the survival the territorial system.
The communities of Mykolaiv region are inclined to implement strategic approaches that give special weight or to the development of the area, or to the development of human resources, or to local civic initiatives. However, a strategy for insuring the sustainability of the local community must include different elements of these approaches, depending on the needs and conditions of the particular locality. Each of these core components is part of a system of methods which are developed by the local community for creation of the sustainable economic development strategy. Now in the global practice of strategic management, the most effective tool for implementing the strategy is a system of balanced indicators. A balanced scorecard allows you to link strategic goals and key metrics that measure the extent to which they are being achieved. To identify and track causation between major financial and non-financial indicators.
The balanced scorecard can be the main tool for strategic management of the socio-economic development of territorial communities. It will allow: to monitor the achievement of the established indicators; to harmonize the budget process with plans and results of the community development; to evaluate the real effectiveness of the economic policy.
Different approaches to local economic development could be combined according to the specificities of every situation. It is necessary to formulate strategies that meet the socio-economic conditions of the community.

Keywords: potential, strategy, integrated territorial community, strategic potential, strategic planning.

References:

1. Berdanova O., Vakulenko V., Valentyuk I.V., Tkachuk A.F. (2017). Strategichne planuvannya rozvitku OTG. K.116 s.
2. Metodologiya strategichnogo planuvannya rozvitku ob’yednanikh teritorialnikh gromad v Ukrayini / Proekt «Pidtrimka politiki regionalnogo rozvitku v Ukrayini».  K., 2016.   55 s.
3. Palchuk V. (2018). Strategiya rozvitku OTG yak putivnik spromozhnosti gromad //Ukrayina: podiyi, fakti, komentari. #22. S. 45–54. URL: http://nbuviap.gov.ua/images/ukraine/2018/ukr22.pdf.
4. Strategiya stalogo rozvitku «Ukrayina – 2020»: Ukaz Prezidenta Ukrayini vid 12 sichnya 2015 roku # 5/2015.  URL: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/5/2015.
5. Tkachuk A. F., Kashevskij V., Mavko P. (2016). Strategichne planuvannya u gromadi (navchalnij modul).  K. : IKCz «Legalnij status».   96 s.
6. Misczeve samovryaduvannya v Ukrayini: suchasnij stan ta osnovni napryami modernizacziyi : nauk. dop. / [redkol. : Yu. V. Kovbasyuk, K. O. Vashhenko, V. V. Tolkovanov ta in.] ; za zag. red. d-ra nauk z derzh. upr., prof. Yu. V. Kovbasyuka.  K. : NADU, 2014.  128 s
7. Storonyanska I., Pelekhatij A. (2014). Finansove zabezpechennya rozvitku silskikh teritorialnikh gromad. Lviv : DU “IRD im M.I. Dolishnogo NAN Ukrayini”.  190s.
8. Kalashnіkova O.Є.Reforma mіscevogo samovryaduvannya na pіvdnі ukraїni: osnovnі tendencії ta problemi (na prikladі Odes’koї ta Mikolaїvs’koї oblastej) [Elektronnij resurs] Analіtichna zapiska Serіya «Regіonalnij rozvitok», No1, 2019  URL: https://niss.gov.ua/sites/default/files/2019-07/ analit %20kalashikova%20regional%20development%201%202019%20checked.pdf
9. European Smart Cities [TU Wien european smart cities 4.0 (2015). URL:   http://www.smart-cities.eu/?cid=2&ver=4 [Дата останнього доступу 06.10.2019].
10. Modernіsіng local government. Іmprovіng local servіces through best value. Department ofthe Envіronment, Transport and the Regіons/Eland House, Bressenden Place. London, 1998. 40p.
11. Quіnn M., Duboіs J. (2005). Communіty Based Monіtorіng: Engagіng and Empowerіng // Forest Servіce Proceedіngs RMRS-P-36 ; Faculty of Envіronmental Desіgn, Unіversіty of Calgary. Calgary, AB, Canada: Alberta Ranchers USDA.   Р. 212–218.

 

UDC 338.43:005.35

 

T. Lunkina

А. Burkovska

А. Burkovska

 

The production of organic products in the agrarian sector is decisive in solving the problems of social and economic development of the rural population and the corresponding rural areas. Organic production is intended to reorient agricultural production from intensive technologies to environmental safety, and then to organic production. The transition of agriculture to organic production is possible only as a subject of compliance with the principles of social responsibility, which are aimed at the rational use of natural resources. In Ukraine the process of creating social responsibility is somewhat different than in other countries. For example, in developed countries of the world, social responsibility is understood not only as paying taxes and contributing to charities, but also as providing the population with the food products that are safe. As for the formation of socially responsible behavior in the consumer of organic produce in Ukraine, it depends, first of all, on the level of income of the population and the level of trust for organic producers.
The article investigates features of socially responsible behavior of the consumer of organic products. The authors reveal that the domestic consumer of agrarian products inclines towards the need for local social responsibility among its producers. The main factor influencing the formation of consumer demand for organic products is the content of external and internal markets. On the basis of questionnaires, the directions of local social responsibility of agrarian business in Ukraine were established, among them: “Responsibility to employees”, “Responsibility to consumers”, “Responsibility to partners (investors)”, “Responsibility to state authorities” and “Responsibility to competitors.” A SWOT analysis was conducted on the social and responsible behavior of the Ukrainian consumer of organic products, and strengths and weaknesses, threats and opportunities for the development of organic produce in the agrarian sector were identified. The authors prove that the formation of socially responsible behavior of consumers in Ukraine today is influenced not by the main aspects of the qualitative and safety of consumption of organic agricultural products, but by the price policy of food products.
It is proved that the formation of socially responsible behavior of consumers of organic products of the agricultural sector of the economy depends on the development of the organic market in the country. The necessity of introducing organic agriculture is due to the following factors: reproduction of soil fertility and preservation of the environment; development of rural areas and improvement of living standards of rural population; improving the efficiency and profitability of agricultural production; providing the consumer market with healthy qualitative products; strengthening the export potential of the state; improving the image of Ukraine as a producer and exporter of high qualitative healthy organic produce; ensuring food security in Ukraine; improving the general well-being of the citizens of the state, etc. It has been found out that with the increase of the standard of living of the population (increase of wages, subsistence minimum) and stabilization of economic and financial development of Ukraine (reduction of inflation, stabilization of national currency), it is possible to speak about full development of society and formation of socially responsible consumer behavior on the basis of organic agricultural products.
Based on the integrated solution of the above-mentioned problems, organic production in Ukraine will become popular and will be able to enter a new stage in the development of organic agriculture in Ukraine, while forming a socially responsible consumer of organic products.

Keywords: social responsibility, local social responsibility, organic production, organic production, consumer, agrarian sector, socially responsible behavior.

References:

1. Andreeva, N. (2010), Ecologically pure production: institutional preconditions, ways and mechanisms of their activation in Ukraine, `Economist`, No. 10.
2. Antonets, A. (2010), Formation of the market for environmentally safe products in organic farming, `Economy of agroindustrial complex`, No. 12.
3. Artysh, V. (2010), Development of the world market for organic products, `Economy of the agroindustrial complex`, No. 3.
4. Begey, S. (2010), Ecological agriculture. New World-2000, Lviv.
5. GDP of Ukraine: financial portal of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://index.minfin.com.ua/index/gdp. – Title from the screen.
6. Gagalyuk, T. (2016), Corporate Social Responsibility of Agrarian Business. German-Ukrainian Agro Dialogue, Kyiv.
7. The Main Department of Statistics in Mykolayiv Region: the official site [Electronic resource]. – Mode of access: http://www.mk.ukrstat.gov.ua/. – Title from the screen.
8. State Statistics Service of Ukraine [Electronic resource]. – Mode of access: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua. – Title from the screen.
9. Environmental partnership: Bulletin of the project “Monitoring and evaluation of the implementation by Ukraine of the provisions of the Luxembourg Declaration on environmental governance” [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.dossier.org.ua/sites/default/files/newsleter_2_2018.pdf.
10. Legislation of Ukraine: official site [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://search.ligazakon.ua. – Title from the screen.
11. Wages: the official site [Electronic resource]. – Mode of access: http://www.zarplata.co.ua. – Title from the screen.
12. Human Development Index: Ukraine is falling, what to do? [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.epravda.com.ua/columns/2017/04/13/623821. – Title from the screen.
13. What are the benefits of a rural farm in terms of ecology: UN Food and Agriculture Organization [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.fao.org/organicag/oa-faq/oa-faq6/en. – Title from the screen.
14. Les, A. (2015), Motives of the purchase of organic products, Organic production and food safety. Polissya, Zhytomyr.
15. Makarenko, S. (2011), Production of environmentally friendly products as the basis for determining the optimal strategy for the development of business entities in the region, `Economic innovations`, No. 44.
16. Organic sector in Ukraine. (2017), materials of the international exhibition of organic products “Biofah”, Nuremberg, Germany.
17. Organic in Ukraine: Federation of Organic Movement in Ukraine: official site [Electronic Resource]. – Access mode: http://www.organic.com.ua/en/homepage/2010-01-26-13-42-29. – Title from the screen.
18. Zinovchuk, N. (2011), Organic agriculture and its development in a co-operation. Ruta, Zhytomyr.
19. Potapenko, V. (2011), Organic agriculture as a factor of economic security, `Economy of agroindustrial complex`, No. 3.
20. About the production and circulation of organic agricultural products and raw materials: the Law of Ukraine dated from September 3, 2013, No. 425-VII, as of 05.05.2015 [Electronic resource]. – Mode of access: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/425-18. – Title from the screen.
21. Publication of documents of the State Service of Statistics of Ukraine [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://ukrstat.org/uk/operativ/operativ2005/fin/fin_ric/fin_u/2003.htm. – Title from the screen.
22. The World of Organic Agriculture: Statistics and Trends // FiBL-IFOAM, 2017 [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://shop.fibl.org/fileadmin/documents/shop/3503-organic-world-2017.pdf. – Title from the screen.
23. World Data Center for Geoinformatics and Sustainable Development: Ukraine is in Indicators of Sustainable Development [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://wdc.org.ua/en/services/ukraine-sd. – Title from the screen.
24. World Data Center for Geoinformatics and Sustainable Development: a Global Analysis of the Quality of Life Safety [Electronic Resource]. – Access mode: http://wdc.org.ua/en/services/country-profiles-visualization. – Title from the screen.
25. Sokol, L. (2008), Ecological (organic) agriculture as a component of sustainable agriculture, `Ecological safety`.
26. Sokhnych, A. (2008), Development of the market for environmentally friendly agricultural products in Ukraine, `Economy of the agroindustrial complex`, No. 10.
27. Federation of Organic Movement in Ukraine: Official Site [Electronic Resource]. – Mode of access: http://www.organic.com.ua/en/homepage
28. Fostolovich, V. (2007), System of ecological management in the enterprise, `Economy of the agroindustrial complex`, No. 7.
29. United Nations development program [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http: //www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home.html.
30. 30. Global Launch of 2016 Human Development Report [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://hdr.undp.org/en/indicators/69206.

 

 

UDC 631.674:005.52

 

V. Shebanin

O. Novikov

M.Karpenko

 

The article substantiates the feasibility of introducing lands irrigation for winter wheat cultivation in agricultural enterprises of Southern Ukraine under the current conditions. As a result of the calculations of capital investments, their payback period and tax revenuesto the budget, it is proved that the organization of modern lands irrigation is a profitable and cost-effective way of mechanized irrigation, and it allows to use more rationally water and land resources in agriculture.
Thus, all the researchers have the same opinion that the yield under the use of irrigated technologies is increased by 2-3 times, even in those regions where natural moisture provides a sufficient level of crop yields, with capital investments from 1400 to 3000 dollars per 1 ha, but the choice of sprinkler or drip irrigation should be based on economic feasibility. The issue of economic efficiency of using modern sprinklers is not fully disclosed by Ukrainian scientists, so it needs further study.
Sprinklers of American production Lindsay Zimmatic were introduced for the first time in 2016 by MNAU in the Southern Ukraine. According to research and practical experience, the applied irrigation system increased irrigation efficiency, promoted productivity growth (winter wheat yield increased in 2019 by 47.58 centners / ha and according to forecasts in 2020 – by 51.52 centners / ha), reduced energy consumption and labor costs. The introduction of sprinkler irrigation has allowed to develop scientifically-grounded technologies of growing modern domestic and foreign varieties and hybrids of grain and technical crops.
Based on the obtained data during 2018-2019 years and the forecast for 2020, it was calculated the economic efficiency of sprinkler irrigation. For three years of  irrigation introduction the additional profit in the amount of 5336,0 thousand UAH from the area of 124 hectares with capital investments about 4610,0 thousand UAH will be received, return on investment in sprinkler irrigation will take 3 years.
During 2018-2020 years due to the introduction of the irrigation system by the university, it will achieve an additional increase in budget revenues by 782.86 thousand UAH and obtain budget efficiency on the level 19.05%.

Keywords: irrigation, economic efficiency, winter wheat, Southern Ukraine, university.

References:

1. Nechyporenko O. M. Napryamy innovacijnogo rozvytku zroshuvanogo zemlerobstva v Ukrayini / O. M. Nechyporenko // Visnyk agrarnoyi nauky. – 2015. – # 8. – S. 61-65.
2. «Strategiya zroshennya ta drenazhu v Ukrayini na period do 2030 roku» vid 14 serpnya 2019 r. # 688-r – URL: http://search.ligazakon.ua/l_doc2.nsf/link1/KR190688.html (data zvernennya: 19.03.2020).
3. Fomichov M. V. Efektyvnist zroshuvannya v agrarnyx pidpryyemstvax Ukrayiny. Agrosvit. 2019. # 7. S. 71–77. DOI: 10.32702/2306-6792.2019.7.71. [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhym dostupu: http://www.agrosvit.info/?op=1&z=2864&i=11. – (data zvernennya: 19.03.2019).
4. Resursy vidkrytogo dostupu. Silske gospodarstvo Ukrayiny. Statystychnyj zbirnyk 2017 rik [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhym dostupu: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/publ7_u.htm. – (data zvernennya: 19.03.2019).
5. Romashhenko M. Zroshuvaty? – Tak! Ale yakym chynom? Propozyciya – Golovnyj zhurnal z pytan agrobiznesu. [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhym dostupu: https://propozitsiya.com/ua/zroshuvati-tak-ale-yakim-chinom – (data zvernennya: 19.03.2019).
6. Fomichov M. V. Systemy zroshuvannya yak ekonomichna kategoriya ta yix efektyvnist. Efektyvna ekonomika. 2019. # 3. – URL: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=6967 (data zvernennya: 19.03.2020). DOI: 10.32702/2307-2105-2019.3.153
7. Kokovixin S.V., Bayeva I.M. Produktyvnist ta ekonomichna efektyvnist vyroshhuvannya gibrydiv kukurudzy zalezhno vid sposobiv polyvu ta zaxystu roslyn v umovax pivdnya Ukrayiny – URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2017.04.013 (data zvernennya: 19.03.2020).
8. Doshh chy kraplya: shho obraty agrariyu ta skilky koshtuye zroshennya. – URL: https://agravery.com/uk/posts/show/dos-ci-krapla-so-obrati-agrariu-ta-skilki-kostue-zrosenna (data zvernennya: 19.03.2020).
9. Doshhuvannya – najbilsh poshyrenyj sposib zroshennya u Poltavskij oblasti. Sajt Regionalnogo ofisu vodnyx resursiv u Poltavskij oblasti – URL: http://www.poltavavodgosp.gov.ua/doshchuvannia-naibilsh-poshyrenyi-sposib-zroshennia-u-poltavskii-oblasti/ (data zvernennya: 19.03.2020).
10. Vozhegova R.A. Gektar polya na zroshenni mozhe prynesty dodatkovo do tysyachi dolariv prybutku – ekspert. – URL: https://superagronom.com/news/4743-gektar-polya-na-zroshenni-moje-prinesti-dodatkovo-do-tisyachi-dolariv-pributku–ekspert (data zvernennya: 19.03.2020).
11. Prosto dodaj vody: 90% posivnyx ploshh Ukrayiny potrebuyut polyvu https://agroday.com.ua/2018/06/07/90-posivnyh-ploshh-ukrayiny-potrebuyut-polyvu/ (data zvernennya: 19.03.2020).
12. Sajt Zakonodavstvo Ukrayiny. Rozporyadzhennya «Pro sxvalennya Strategiyi zroshennya ta drenazhu v Ukrayini na period do 2030 roku» https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/688-2019-%D1%80 (data zvernennya: 19.03.2020).
13. Investyciyi u zroshuvalni systemy zdatni okupytysya za kilka rokiv – URL: http://agroconf.org/content/investiciyi-u-zroshuvalni-sistemi-zdatni-okupitisya-za-kilka-rokiv (data zvernennya: 19.03.2020).
14. Dankevych V. (Ne)zroshuvani zemli v Ukrayini: milyardni zbytky vzhe i zagroza spustelyuvannya v nedalekij perspektyvi. [Elektronnyj resurs]. – Rezhym dostupu: https://np.pl.ua/2018/11/ne-zroshuvani-zemli-v-ukraini-mil-iardni-zbytky-vzhe-i-zahroza-spusteliuvannia-v-nedalekiy-perspektyvi/ (data zvernennya: 19.03.2020).
15. Romashhenko M.I. ta in. Rekomendaciyi z operatyvnogo kontrolyu ta upravlinnya rezhymom zroshennya silskogospodarskyx kultur iz zastosuvannyam tenziometrychnogo metodu (naukovo-metodychne).