{"id":3280,"date":"2017-07-05T09:39:30","date_gmt":"2017-07-05T06:39:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/visnyk.mnau.edu.ua\/?p=3280"},"modified":"2017-07-26T14:38:58","modified_gmt":"2017-07-26T11:38:58","slug":"n93v1r2017kotykova","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/visnyk.mnau.edu.ua\/en\/n93v1r2017kotykova\/","title":{"rendered":"Indication of the ecological conditions of agricultural land in Ukraine: a social unit."},"content":{"rendered":"

UDC 332.363.711.144<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

O. Kotykova<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

It was conducted the research of indicators, identified earlier by the author, of social state of agricultural land use in Ukraine. These indicators include: the number of born, the number of deaths and natural population growth in rural areas; life expectancy at birth in rural areas; fertility, mortality and natural population growth in rural areas; the infant mortality rate, the presence of toxic industrial waste in per capita; providing the population with agricultural products; consumption of food in rural areas; factor of social efficiency; gross agricultural output per capita; average housing per rural capita; housing equipment in rural areas;average level of cultural institutions and the arts per rural capita; provision in rural areas durables.
\nAs a result it was made a conclusion about the discrepancy of the achieved state to the conditions of sustainable development of agricultural land use in Ukraine.
\nIn particular, it was found that out of twenty-six indicators that are taken for analysis, only four indicators of social unit (rural housing and its equipment, the infant mortality rate, the volume of gross agricultural output per 1 person) and four indicators of socio-economic bloc (land availability, investment per capita, quintylyty income differentiation factor , the level of economic activity in rural areas) are better from the baseline value over the years, and others – eighteen – worse.
\nDetermined that in the rural areas declining the population birth rate, the natural growth and life expectancy at birth, increase the mortality. Rural economy crisis led to a significant reduction of the rural population. Reduced output of major agricultural products in per capita and consumption of food does not meet reasonable standards, deteriorated the level of availability of culture and art institutions.
\nProved that the environmental and economic development of the land use did not provide the improvement of social indicators, didn’t laid the positive foundations for future generations.<\/p>\n

Key words:<\/strong> indication, model, land use, sustainability, social state.<\/em><\/p>\n

Indication of the ecological conditions of agricultural land in Ukraine: a social unit.<\/a><\/p>\n

References:
\n1. Medouz D. Kh. Za predelamy rosta \/ D. Kh. Medouz, D. L. Medouz. \u2013 M. : Pangheja, 1994. \u2014 345 s.
\n2. The limits to growth. A report for the Club of Rome\u2019s project on the predicament of mankind \/ Meadows D.H., Meadows D.L., Randers J., Behrens III. \u2014 W.W.L. \u2014 1972. \u2014 548 p.
\n3. The Limits To Growth \/ Donella H. Meadows, Dennis L. Meadows, Jorgen Randers, William W. Berners III. \u2014 Universe Books, 1972. \u2014 205 p.
\n4. Daly H. E. Towards some operational principles of sustainable development \/\/ Ecological Economics. \u2014 1990. \u2014 \u21162. \u2014 P. 1\u20146.
\n5. Constanza R. Assuring sustainability of ecological economic systems \/\/ The book “Ecological Economics”. \u2014 N.Y. : Columbia University Press. 1991. \u2014 P. 331\u2014343.
\n6. Brundtland G.H. Opening address to the seventh meeting of the World commission on enviroment and development \/\/ World Commission on Environment and Development. Highlights from the Public hearing. \u2014 M. \u2014 1986.
\n7. Jay W. Forrester. World Dynamics. \u2014 Cambridge, Mass.: Productivity Press; 2nd edition, 1971. \u2014 141 p.
\n8. Akymova T. A. \u042dkologhyja. Chelovek \u2014 \u042dkonomyka \u2014 Byota \u2014 Sreda : [uchebnyk dlja studentov vuzov] \u2014 2 yzd. pererab. y dop. \/ T. A. Akymova, V. V. Khaskyn. \u2014 M. : Junyty-Dyana, 2002. \u2014 566 s.
\n9. Bobylev S. V\u044bzov\u044b kryzysa: kak yzmerjatj ustojchyvostj razvytyja? \/ C. Bob\u044blev, N. Zubarevych, S. Solovj’eva \/\/ Vopros\u044b \u044dkonomyky. \u2013 2015. \u2013 # 1. \u2013 C. 147
\n10. Vynokurova N. F. Ghlobaljnaja \u044dkologhyja \/ N. F. Vynokurova, V. V. Trushyn. \u2014 M. : Prosveshhenye, 1998. \u2014 270 s.
\n11. Zamjatyna M. F. Teoretyko-metaloghycheskye osnov\u044b \u044dkologhyzacyy \u044dkonomycheskogho y tekhnologhycheskogho reghyonaljnogho razvytyja \/ M. F. Zamjatyna \/\/ \u042dkonomyka Severo-Zapada: problem\u044b y perspektyv\u044b razvytyja. \u2013 2006. \u2013 # 1. \u2013 C. 9
\n12. Karynceva A. Y. \u042dkonomycheskye osnov\u044b planyrovanyja processov \u044dkologhychesky ustojchyvogho razvytyja terrytoryy : dys. na soyskanye uchenoj stepeny kand. \u044dkon. nauk: 08.08.01 \/ A. Y. Karynceva. \u2014 Sum\u044b : SumGhU, 1997. \u2014 230 s.
\n13. Lukjjanchykov N. N. \u042dkonomyka y orghanyzacyja pryrodopoljzovanyja : [uchebnyk dlja vuzov] \u2014 2-e yzd., pererab. y dop. \/ N. P. Lukjjanchykov, Y. M. Potravn\u044bj. \u2014 M. : JuNYTY-DANA, 2002. \u2014 454 s.
\n14. Maljavyna A. V. Formyrovanye napravlenyj \u044dkologhychesky ustojchyvogho razvytyja narodnogho khozjajstva Rossyjskoj Federacyy \/ A. V. Maljavyna. \u2014 M., 1994. \u2014 58 s.
\n15. Moskalenko A. P. \u042dkonomyka pryrodopoljzovanyja y okhran\u044b okruzhajushhej sred\u044b : [uchebnoe posobye] \/ A. P. Moskalenko. \u2014 M., 2003. \u2014 224 s.
\n16. Tykhonov A. Gh. Naukovi zasady stalogho rozvytku zemlekorystuvannja: indykacija ekologhichnogho stanu \/ A. Gh. Tykhonov, N. V. Ghrebenjuk, O. V. Tykhonenko, V. P. Fedenko \/\/ Zemlevporjadkuvannja. \u2014 2003. \u2014 #1. \u2014 S. 15\u201420.
\n17. Tykhonov A. Gh. Naukovi zasady stalogho rozvytku zemlekorystuvannja: indykacija ekonomichnogho stanu \/ A. Gh. Tykhonov, N. V. Ghrebenjuk, O. V. Tykhonenko, V. P. Fedenko \/\/ Zemlevporjadkuvannja. \u2014 2003. \u2014 #1. \u2014 S. 3\u201415.
\n18. Tykhonov A. Gh. Naukovi zasady stalogho rozvytku zemlekorystuvannja: indykacija socialjnogho stanu ta indykacijna modelj \/ A. Gh. Tykhonov, N. V. Ghrebenjuk, O. V. Tykhonenko, V. P. Fedenko \/\/ Zemlevporjadkuvannja. \u2014 2003. \u2014 #2. \u2014 S. 8\u201419.
\n19. Tykhonov A. Gh. Naukovi zasady stalogho rozvytku zemlekorystuvannja: pryncypy, indykacija, pokaznyky \/ A. Gh. Tykhonov, N. V. Ghrebenjuk, O. V. Tykhonenko, V. P. Fedenko \/\/ Zemlevporjadkuvannja. \u2014 2002. \u2014 #2. \u2014 S. 13\u201421.
\n20. Tykhonov A. Gh. Naukovi zasady stalogho rozvytku zemlekorystuvannja: sutnistj, pidkhody, zakonomirnosti \/ A. Gh. Tykhonov, N. V. Ghrebenjuk, O. V. Tykhonenko, V. P. Fedenko \/\/ Zemlevporjadkuvannja. \u2014 2002. \u2014 #2. \u2014 S. 3\u20149.
\n21. Kotykova O. I. Metodologhichni ta metodychni osnovy kompleksnoji ocinky stijkogho rozvytku siljsjkoghospodarsjkogho zemlekorystuvannja \/\/ O. I. Kotykova \/\/ Sbornyk nauchn\u044bkh trudov SWorld. Materyal\u044b mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-praktycheskoj konferencyy \u00abPerspektyvn\u044be ynnovacyy v nauke, obrazovanyy, proyzvodstve y transporte 2012\u00bb. \u2014 V\u044bpusk 2. Tom 20. \u2014 Odessa : Kupryenko, 2012. \u2013 S. 85-94.
\n22. Statystychnyj shhorichnyk Ukrajiny za 2014 : statystychnyj zbirnyk [Elektronnyj resurs] \/ za red. I. M Zhuka. \u2014 Rezhym dostupu : http:\/\/www.ukrstat.gov.ua\/
\n23. Socialjni indykatory rivnja zhyttja naselennja : statystychnyj zbirnyk za 2014 rik [Elektronnyj resurs] \/ za red. I. M Zhuka. \u2014 Rezhym dostupu : http:\/\/www.ukrstat.gov.ua\/<\/p>\n

Issue \u21161 (93), 2017<\/a><\/h4>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

UDC 332.363.711.144 O. Kotykova It was conducted the research of indicators, identified earlier by the author, of social state of agricultural land use in Ukraine. These indicators include: the number of born, the number of deaths and natural population growth in rural areas; life expectancy at birth in rural areas; fertility, mortality and natural population […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[609],"tags":[86],"aioseo_notices":[],"views":567,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/visnyk.mnau.edu.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3280"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/visnyk.mnau.edu.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/visnyk.mnau.edu.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/visnyk.mnau.edu.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/visnyk.mnau.edu.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3280"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/visnyk.mnau.edu.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3280\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/visnyk.mnau.edu.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3280"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/visnyk.mnau.edu.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3280"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/visnyk.mnau.edu.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3280"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}